古董海马300米

OHSEAL 发表于 2012-4-7 14:27
' o- Z  X$ C6 T0 ^" n2W左右我觉得能接受.

能到2w？那我是错过了只1w6的，半年前

toni 发表于 2012-4-8 22:33
能到2w？那我是错过了只1w6的，半年前

确定是正品好品?

OHSEAL 发表于 2012-4-8 22:35
确定是正品好品?

经过几天功课，我基本已经对能找到一只好品的，100%60年代全原装的SM300的可能性不抱什么希望了

淘米桶 发表于 2012-4-9 00:14
) W: i; C# M% `+ Q0 n经过几天功课，我基本已经对能找到一只好品的，100%60年代全原装的SM300的可能性不抱什么希望了

: |8 L0 x. Z% K1 P+ f7 P  T拿不拿？

OHSEAL 发表于 2012-4-9 00:23
& u; C& R; N7 b' ^, Z) d" k拿不拿？

如果是这样的，我拿
5 G7 E8 C! I2 v- X9 H" h+ F7 K
( b3 {4 b  }/ D; @$ N8 P  j' q6 w8 o- N+ \7 d
* Z  t9 B2 r8 y

在欧米茄官网的vintage forum里找到这样一段话，基本断了我的念想

This reference is considered as an after sales item since 1999-2000 and doesn’t consequently belong to our International Collection. It is related to a modern watchhead, crown, dial, hands and case back for the Seamaster 300 Series from the 60's (ref. ST 165.024 of cal. 550 or 552 and ST 166.024 of cal. 565). The reason is that no watch heads were available anymore for these two watch styles and that we had then to create some new to guarantee the after sales service for such watch styles. Of course, the movement corresponding to ref. 166.0324 should always be a "vintage" movement related to the Seamaster 300 Series from the 60's.
Case : round (42 mm diameter)
1 _( p  [( H; p- T8 K2 [Case back : engraved with the sea horse medallion and "Seamaster Certified High Pressure Waterproof".
Bezel : rotating stainless steel bezel with inserted “0-60” black scale.
Size between case lugs : 20 mm

! m0 m5 `" J- F9 H/ A2 F: K' J/ C" R

# N8 \) |: M/ S) @+ n( R4 Q2 ^
8 [) j# L; A/ g2 S1 [1963年更早一些的seamaster 300, ref. CK14755


/ O  G0 b& f1 ]" G/ ^5 @

1965年的catalogue, ref. 165.024

; k& j7 `# X( K# S: f) N0 k% z

' i1 v2 W$ g9 J% {
; m( F, P6 p7 l0 v" Y( \3 L, N- [7 q) Z

1957年，最早的seamaster 300, ref. 2913


5 S6 g+ f3 \& n
6 ?' `; w+ N% h# ?: P3 w6 l# ?
3 k- m- B  i5 _. W! w

OHSEAL 发表于 2012-4-8 22:35
/ g& c" [! ]% i6 f3 L2 \6 d  O确定是正品好品?

: Y. ^" ~4 q! U- s6 E9 k
1 W* _1 P6 U- J' a; o  \7 q% G  e
是这只
3 T$ g* T) W' v# b6 Z# H& t

金帆 发表于 2012-4-8 11:06
3 y2 X, A! J! ~! x- A0 w是562机芯吗？

4 U9 e6 j) U+ l) Y3 ]* J! I6 u不得记得是562 还是565了，

toni 发表于 2012-4-9 13:14
7 E/ e5 _* w2 W; |( @, h是这只

( f/ B3 t: B4 m+ P5 p/ ~这只至少面圈针也都是换了现代的了，对比下60年的原装SM300，看看表圈上的那个数字“1”的字体就知道区别了
$ B' r- B, }4 g: {+ @5 T

$ a5 T# _" ~' H0 a/ m

toni 发表于 2012-4-9 13:14
是这只

, M9 {- ~5 A3 r! t4 }有点怕.